From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 04:00:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B781065672 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DF98FC08 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3Q40TN6017807; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:00:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q3Q40T18017804; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:00:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:00:29 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Dwayne MacKinnon In-Reply-To: <201204251150.42910.dmk@ncf.ca> Message-ID: References: <201204251150.42910.dmk@ncf.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:00:29 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New xorg and older Intel video X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:00:30 -0000 On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote: > Just a quick question: I run a couple of boxes that use older Intel video (no > KMS). Am I correct in my belief I should avoid the WITH_NEW_XORG flag? Yes. Intel + xorg-server-1.10.6 wants KMS. xorg-server-1.7.7 is what you get without the WITH_NEW_XORG. I just set it up on 9-stable, amd64, on a 965GM system, and it works fine. > A cc would be appreciated, as I'm not subscribed. That's SOP here, actually.