From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jul 9 9:55:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6849314C0D for ; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 09:55:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA53727; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:55:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Warner Losh Cc: Gustavo V G C Rios , security@FreeBSD.ORG, bos-owner-br@sekure.org Subject: Re: suid/guid References: <3784D440.1075EFB3@tdnet.com.br> <199907091622.KAA20280@harmony.village.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 09 Jul 1999 18:55:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: Warner Losh's message of "Fri, 09 Jul 1999 10:22:45 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Warner Losh writes: > Idea: Would it make sense to document in the makefiles of these > programs why it is set[ug]id? I think it would... I think it would be an excellent idea... it would also make sense to document how the program will behave if it is not s[ug]id and how much of the functionality will be lost. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message