From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 22 08:52:31 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BB5E216A4CE; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:52:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blake.polstra.com (dsl081-189-066.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net
	[64.81.189.66])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 75F1443D58; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:52:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jdp@polstra.com)
Received: from strings.polstra.com (dsl081-189-067.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net
	[64.81.189.67])
	by blake.polstra.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBMGqTlB036520;
	Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:52:30 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from jdp@polstra.com)
Message-ID: <XFMail.20031222085229.jdp@polstra.com>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20031222113523.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:52:29 -0800 (PST)
From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.171788, version=0.14.5
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: RE: PII SMP system hangs during boot with ACPI enabled
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:52:31 -0000

On 22-Dec-2003 John Baldwin wrote:
>> Your patch looks like a keeper.
> 
> Well, except that it breaks other machines like my test machines here. :)

Oh. :-(  Well, they are probably more important than my old PII/400.

> I'm trying to work on making it work better though as well as not hardcode
> 9 for the SCI interrupt.  Watch this space.

Will do.  If you'd like any more tests run here, just ask.

John