From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 30 05:41:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97611A76 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@aboutsupport.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com (mail-bk0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D7E2498 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id r7so1876213bkg.36 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:41:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=XsKsYRerIgVxgt/Uf8rIsDhw1CsT13Akrucxk4mFInE=; b=iYTkjfbPfvnkcoWGYepBo2g+V6ECc0to9IbZQiXxRvw+MZpa3Zq71h5FitF0kPxWbg QpKvyI6Qwxxi+JHhleYJo5DNapQ6kKYf1vC4e6YNs1+cmJd0/kEIelaNtxYpc1GdgYW2 84Yb2ry6zvipQsdTTAadm7QpM5Y8wMv4KBAPSsSU8eySDWnLCZHn67pECHhZilLxmecy 6W5eru5Oi8y9Fri/7jGrQ41gliqCs8y0F8AseWv9c9z1oNOgWqq6RcC5cgfv0q1p8Yjk 4Gpnqd1vvZCzikZ6Je03Y4FG7ocbfn5c/XOfrNzypuDiSBnw58gMHIUNrkvlpV5Yv10T raXA== X-Received: by 10.204.71.133 with SMTP id h5mr1732984bkj.0.1375162469145; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.23.102.189] ([93.155.250.90]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qw6sm16701143bkb.4.2013.07.29.22.34.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51F7505B.3090200@aboutsupport.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:34:19 +0300 From: "Zyumbilev, Peter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: 2 lines References: <51F66820.4080907@aboutsupport.com> <51F668E2.4090806@aboutsupport.com> <1375105599.9477.2811311.2C84EDDD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <51F69A9F.3050800@aboutsupport.com> <51F6A128.6060903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <51F6A128.6060903@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+qwZ5HpYCks/Pnrp6QkCw2e0/U3zULX4zhXfMaWkRiRE9sZaJw2R+gV1tgxJEpm+mtr/5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:41:05 -0000 On 29/07/2013 20:06, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 29/07/2013 17:38, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote: >> Not sure what is the best way nowadays to get own /24 or at least /26 ? >> I wonder if there is "second hand" ip market :-) > > > Get a /64 or a /48 and subnet it...? > > Cheers, > > Matthew > Hi, Lines are from 2 different ISPs and evn come physically via different route - protection again construction workers :-) Basically to be fair I need one single IP to have such fail over - the Citrix server. However really not sure what is the best way - the only feasible solution I found so far is DNS faiolver http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/services/dns-failover-system-monitoring/. However I am not 100% sure how well it will work and if this may cause more troubles and embarrassment in front of the customer than simply giving them in a email gate1.example.com(primary) gate2.example.com(backup) to connect. Cheers, Peter