From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Apr 15 15: 5:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F2C37B5C6 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:05:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA22894 for ; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 00:05:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id AAA13233 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 00:05:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1256537B525; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:05:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA44561; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:05:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA29099; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:05:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200004152205.QAA29099@harmony.village.org> To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/tcsh - Imported sources Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Brian Somers , "David E. O'Brien" , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "15 Apr 2000 15:00:02 PDT." References: <1210.955826595@critter.freebsd.dk> <200004152113.PAA28692@harmony.village.org> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:05:04 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami writes: : I wouldn't say "people generally" argued against" it. Peter Wemm, : myself and a lot of other committers supported it, saying that tcsh is : just a newer and maintained version of our old csh. Agreed. Those that argued against it sited size. : I do remember people setting up strawman arguments about embedded : systems just to be knocked down by the embedded folks themselves. :> Well, I am an embedded folk and argued for the change. However, my boss argued against, so that more than cancels me out :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message