From owner-freebsd-current Tue Feb 23 16:43:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3083F10F06; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:43:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id QAA54257; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:40:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:40:18 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199902240040.QAA54257@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Eivind Eklund , Jos Backus , Dmitrij Tejblum , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic: zone: entry not free References: <26568.919794608@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :In message <19990223191857.H10845@bitbox.follo.net>, Eivind Eklund writes: : :>A couple of the invariants we have modify the :>behaviour to make it possible to check for things, and this should be :>separate from the ones that doesn't modify the behaviour beyond adding :>checks. : :That sounds more like DIAGNOSTIC kind of material, doesn't it ? : :-- :Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member :phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." It sure does. DIAGNOSTIC is historically intrusive. INVARIANTS should definitely *not* be intrusive. Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message