From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Apr 20 20:39:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from isris.pair.com (isris.pair.com [209.68.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68FEF37B417 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 71074 invoked by uid 3130); 21 Apr 2002 03:39:41 -0000 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 23:39:41 -0400 From: Garrett Rooney To: Andrew Cc: cy@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/37290: New port: tool for setting the title of xterms Message-ID: <20020421033941.GB37418@electricjellyfish.net> References: <200204210301.g3L31Zd27349@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020421133225.A30679-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020421133225.A30679-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:36:12PM +1000, Andrew wrote: > > > On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 cy@FreeBSD.org wrote: > > > Why do we need this port? The following shell script can set XTerm > > Shall we rewrite all programs in the Bourne shell? There are a number that > could be. I don't really mind if it gets commited or not but I thought it > should be the end users choice as to what they install or if they wirte > scripts to do what they need. If we are going to only have ports that a > number deem useful we can certainly quickly save some disk space ;-) note that we already have the 'xtset' port (x11/xtset) which is also written in c and does (i think) the same thing as this port. -garrett -- garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message