From owner-cvs-ports  Sat Nov 29 15:19:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA26440
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 15:19:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports)
Received: from ns11.rim.or.jp (root@ns11.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.230])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA26325;
          Sat, 29 Nov 1997 15:16:56 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp)
Received: from rayearth.rim.or.jp (rayearth.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.242]) by ns11.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-ns11/RIMNET-2) with ESMTP
	id IAA08806; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 08:16:44 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by rayearth.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-uucp1/RIMNET) with UUCP
	id IAA00610; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 08:16:43 +0900 (JST)
Received: from turkey.aslm.rim.or.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aslm.rim.or.jp (8.8.8/3.4W4-SMTP) with ESMTP id IAA25560; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 08:07:04 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199711292307.IAA25560@mail.aslm.rim.or.jp>
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: max@wide.ad.jp
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/eterm Makefile ports/x11/eterm/files md5
From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 29 Nov 1997 14:04:24 -0800 (PST)"
References: <199711292204.OAA05640@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.54 on Emacs 19.28.1, Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 08:07:03 +0900
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

     > Thanks, but doesn't compile on 2.2-stable.

     > pixmap.c:605: `R_OK' undeclared (first use this function)

Hmmm, I don't understand this.
`R_OK' is defined in /usr/include/sys/unistd.h which is included from
/usr/include/unistd.h.  (This one is included from main.h which is
included from pixmap.c.)  And, it looks that this is also the case
with -stable from what I can see on freefall.  (I don't have -stable
machine handy.)

Is freefall running *pure* -stable?

     Cheers,
Max