From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 5 02:16:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E679516A41F for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 02:16:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AADD43D45 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 02:16:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t13so20444wxc for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 18:16:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V9K5ob24PfYoktxPd8m0YkCBDU1ERm9lf+DjNqBovJ3FkeM6P+wEZTdjixs15kPJHSxQL7u5KtOPc9t7rxOk2j6NnmuNbuKIeyxydBwXNNKysCw6i7AFQJZrJT+j9qmnEwtwDWmH3aXmZyRPjO1AokZ0xrtVniPpl3nnDO0rDJw= Received: by 10.70.100.20 with SMTP id x20mr511569wxb; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:07:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.91.17 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:07:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57416b300511031607m5ebcbf5elde8c3a20b044b7e4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:07:24 +1100 From: Peter Clutton To: Greg Barniskis In-Reply-To: <436AA389.9010803@scls.lib.wi.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <436A8E90.20908@ccstores.com> <436AA389.9010803@scls.lib.wi.us> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 02:16:26 -0000 On 11/4/05, Greg Barniskis wrote: > Seems to me like those who are up in arms over this: > (a) had every chance to participate in the process > (b) did not participate in the process except to heartily denounce > the very existence of the process and its goal > (c) even now outright refuse to go and be part of the advocacy@ > community where this discussion is germane to that list charter > (d) need a real big mop for all the spilled milk and tears Yeh, and if their parent really is the best designer and artist who _ever_ lived in the _entire_ history of the universe, and are much better than anybody elses parents, and thus is the smartest kid on the block, why didn't they design something?