From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Apr 2 15:09:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA26080 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 2 Apr 1998 15:09:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt050n33.san.rr.com (@dt050n33.san.rr.com [204.210.31.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA26048 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 1998 15:09:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@san.rr.com) Received: from san.rr.com (Studded@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt050n33.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA09901; Thu, 2 Apr 1998 15:09:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Studded@san.rr.com) Message-ID: <35241A96.4962A670@san.rr.com> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 15:09:10 -0800 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE-0325 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Hermit Hacker CC: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adaptec 2940UW with two ?? UW drives... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk The Hermit Hacker wrote: > Actually, bringing the transfer rate down to 10Mps vs 20Mps > appears to have improved both the uptime (3days now) as well as the > overall performance of the machine... Someone mentioned checking the cabling previously, did you try this? It seems to me that if reducing the speed helps there may be a cable problem. I have a 2940UW with an IBM DCAS UW drive on it and never had a problem. Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message