From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 22 06:42:08 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0851D5C;
 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:42:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214])
 (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D542350;
 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:42:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org
 (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3B731FE027;
 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:42:05 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <541FC4B5.2030406@selasky.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:41:57 +0200
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: Does the xHCI driver has a spec violation?
References: <20140922.135800.1954695532570247771.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
 <541FBB84.6050508@selasky.org>
 <20140922.153122.2173639902447525862.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140922.153122.2173639902447525862.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:42:08 -0000

On 09/22/14 08:31, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Hi HPS,
>
> Could you refer to the following document (4.6.6 Configure Endpoint:P.99)?
> This document shows:
>
> If the Drop Context flag is `1' and the Add Context flag is `1', the xHC shall:
> o Release the current Resources and Bandwidth allocated to the
>    endpoint and assign the new Resources and Bandwidth requested for
>    the endpoint.
>

Hi,

I see.

Then what is missing to your patch is to mask away bits 0 and 1, because 
those are reserved for D0 and D1 and should be zero?

--HPS