From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Jul 10 16:27:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from kenny.netrail.net (kenny.netrail.net [205.215.10.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D3E37B8D5 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:27:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhartley@netrail.net) Received: from jhartley (kenny.netrail.net [205.215.10.5]) by kenny.netrail.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA02054 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 19:29:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jeff Hartley" To: Subject: SysKonnect and Intel gig boards Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 19:26:36 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Anyone have any experience (good/bad/indifferent) with the Intel GigSX boards, or the SysKonnect dual-port GigSX boards, under 4.0-RELEASE? I'm in need of quad-gig boxes, and I'm reluctant to stick with 3COM, based on an unsatisfactory failure rate in the past. Horror stories or blessings, anyone? I did notice that SysKonnect seems to be friendlier with the developer community than Intel (go figure). Thanks, -Jeff Hartley To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message