From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 15:15:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF14416DF98 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com (out5.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A803A13C478 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.internal (unknown [10.202.2.149]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BA51BF939; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:15:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by out1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:15:40 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: uOA30/E/vVjnp64Qh3Lj9N2T1XLM8XLShy2do4Zhr7k9 1172070940 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA6E135F3; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:15:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45DC61CF.6000206@incunabulum.net> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:14:23 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luigi Rizzo References: <45DC5C33.8020806@incunabulum.net> <20070221071214.B88996@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20070221071214.B88996@xorpc.icir.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NetworkRfcCompliance is born X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:15:08 -0000 Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:50:27PM +0000, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NetworkRfcCompliance >> > > before it is too late to change, maybe it is the case to > spell RFC as all capital letters ? > It would surely be better named NetworkStandardsCompliance as IEEE stuff appears inevitably also. I am pressed for time at the moment, so, other volunteers very welcome to do so... BMS