From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 28 04:09:03 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E3E16A427
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:09:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from craig@olyun.gank.org)
Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0891B43D5C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:09:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from craig@olyun.gank.org)
Received: by ion.gank.org (mail, from userid 1001)
	id B37AF2BC50; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:09:01 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:09:01 -0500
From: Craig Boston <craig@olyun.gank.org>
To: SUZUKI Shinsuke <suz@kame.net>
Message-ID: <20051028040901.GA47012@nowhere>
References: <20051028012957.GA50419@nowhere> <x7wtjynvlm.wl%suz@alaxala.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <x7wtjynvlm.wl%suz@alaxala.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.0-RC1 IPv6 losing local subnet route
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:09:04 -0000

On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:55:49PM +0900, SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote:
> Let me confirm.
> 
> In your configuration, em0 and em1 have the same prefix.
> Is it intentionally configured?
> #normally, IPv6 operator does not assign prefix in such manner...

Yes, but em0 and em1 are on different computers attached to the same
network (em0 on the second computer isn't connected to anything right
now).  I think they have to have the same prefix to talk to each other
without routing?

Craig