From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 20:23:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342EE16A41F; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74D713C45E; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D100120B2; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:23:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7CD20A6; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:23:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4D45B54D4; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:23:33 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: youshi10@u.washington.edu References: Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:23:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: (youshi10@u.washington.edu's message of "Sun\, 3 Jun 2007 09\:37\:47 -0700 \(PDT\)") Message-ID: <86sl97foze.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Stefan Esser , Neil Short , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg 7.2 & environment variables set in login.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:23:33 -0000 youshi10@u.washington.edu writes: > Stefan's absolutely right. What I would do is use en_US.UTF-8, because > it's unicode, but depending on your platform and how much memory you > have, representing characters in 2 bytes (unicode) vs 1 byte > (ASCII/ISO charsets), might not be such a hip idea (thinking embedded, > low memory machines)... UTF-8 only uses two bytes when one isn't enough. It is a strict superset of ASCII. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no