From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 6 10:31:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F5C106566C for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F9F8FC0A for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBlEG-0000WD-Qs for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:31:04 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:31:04 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:31:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:30:53 +0200 Lines: 52 Message-ID: References: <20111004160043.GA16034@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <051853CE-03EC-4EEC-A5AC-C380131B28E4@gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBA91D3F6C65E1DD9045A1A7A" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/7.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: Does anyone use nscd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:31:06 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBA91D3F6C65E1DD9045A1A7A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/10/2011 09:38, Trond Endrest=C3=B8l wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:54+1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >=20 >> On 05/10/2011, at 2:30, Michel Talon wrote: >> >>> Des wrote: >>>> Does anyone actually use nscd? >>> >>> I am using it since a lot of time. I have not experienced annoying bu= gs >>> in all that time. The last time i have been hit is when installing so= me >>> new softs which require adding some user and some group with pw. Of >>> course this doesn't work well with caching these data, and i had >>> completely forgotten i was using a cache. This is very perplexing. >> >> In my experience ncsd seems to cache negative hits forever,=20 >> regardless of the setting for negative-time-to-live. >=20 > I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who has noticed this odd=20 > behaviour of nscd. Shame on me for not speaking up sooner, but I=20 > feared I might be proved wrong (again), and yes, that's a lame excuse. = > :-/ +1. It's very annoying when installing ports which add users - the port adds it then in some future code checks it and it fails. I've noticed it with at least CUPS. --------------enigBA91D3F6C65E1DD9045A1A7A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6Ng10ACgkQldnAQVacBchoOACbBnyx6jw2hoJBkzVa9qU4c0KQ WA0AnR4YDKKB7RJo5WGNq6rKIFgf5VD9 =XewQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBA91D3F6C65E1DD9045A1A7A--