From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 21 06:28:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AF9B44944; Sat, 21 May 2016 06:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel@vnode.se) Received: from smtp.vnode.se (smtp.vnode.se [185.137.191.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB731FC3; Sat, 21 May 2016 06:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel@vnode.se) Received: from ymer.vnode.se (81-235-218-96-no20.tbcn.telia.com [81.235.218.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.vnode.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4715B7327; Sat, 21 May 2016 08:28:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 08:28:47 +0200 From: Joel Dahl To: "K. Macy" Cc: Johan Hendriks , "O. Hartmann" , "current@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: em(4) broken in HEAD? Message-ID: <20160521062847.GA58736@ymer.vnode.se> Mail-Followup-To: "K. Macy" , Johan Hendriks , "O. Hartmann" , "current@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" References: <20160520115550.GA56197@ymer.vnode.se> <20160520135946.674eb7ac@hermann> <20160520140528.GA56478@ymer.vnode.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 06:28:52 -0000 On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 07:32:30PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > I'm seeing watchdog resets on em(4) in my VMWare as of the last day or two. > > > > > > > I don't use ipfw, aliases or anything other than stock networking. I > > was unable to copy a large image off the VM without getting an > > unending stream of watchdog resets which could only be fixed by a > > reboot. Fortunately a subsequent IFC fixed it as of ~15 hours ago. > > > > I take that back. It's still happening. OK - good to know. I'm going to be travelling for a few days so I won't have time to do a binary search to find the commit that broke it. -- Joel