From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 08:26:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BD516A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:26:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2F943D68 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:26:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id hBIGQ5SN002339; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:26:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3/Submit) id hBIGQ5kI002338; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:26:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:26:05 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Hideki Yamamoto Message-ID: <20031218082605.A2252@xorpc.icir.org> References: <1071763256.543.10.camel@ptp.northnetworks.ca> <20031219.011213.27797873.yamamoto436@oki.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20031219.011213.27797873.yamamoto436@oki.com>; from yamamoto436@oki.com on Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:12:13AM +0900 cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW for IPv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:26:24 -0000 On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:12:13AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote: > > Hi, > > I am interested in ipfw for IPv6, especially on dummynet. > Does someone have information on ipfw for IPv6? Two students of mine have a basically working version of ipfw2 for ipv6 (with dummynet too). I need to review the code before making patches available, though. In the detail, the layer2 version of the code (where ipv6 fields are matched within ether_input()/ether_output(), are ok, whereas the layer3 version (call from ip6input(), ip6output()) need a bit more debugging when used with dummynet because suspending and resuming computation within ip6output() is tricky for the amount of state around -- that was time consuming in ipv4 as well. cheers luigi > Thanks in advance. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Hideki YAMAMOTO | > Broadband Media Solutions Department | E-mail: yamamoto436@oki.com > Broadband Media Company | Tel: +81-3-3455-0870 > Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | FAX: +81-3-3798-7670 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"