From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 22 06:53:14 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF98BF3F;
 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:53:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.mei.co.jp (smtp.mei.co.jp [133.183.100.20])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C3F60E;
 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:53:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gw.jp.panasonic.com ([157.8.1.157])
 by smtp.mei.co.jp (8.12.11.20060614/3.7W/kc-maile14) with ESMTP id
 s8M6rBid008826; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:53:12 +0900 (JST)
Received: from epochmail.jp.panasonic.com ([157.8.1.130])
 by mail.jp.panasonic.com (8.11.6p2/3.7W/kc-maili13) with ESMTP id s8M6rCJ26573;
 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:53:12 +0900
Received: by epochmail.jp.panasonic.com (8.12.11.20060308/3.7W/lomi12) id
 s8M6rCYh011104; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:53:12 +0900
Received: from localhost
 by lomi12.jp.panasonic.com (8.12.11.20060308/3.7W) with ESMTP id
 s8M6rBdo011074; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:53:12 +0900
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:53:10 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20140922.155310.745066180705048059.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
To: hps@selasky.org
Subject: Re: Does the xHCI driver has a spec violation?
From: Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
In-Reply-To: <541FC4B5.2030406@selasky.org>
References: <541FBB84.6050508@selasky.org>
 <20140922.153122.2173639902447525862.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
 <541FC4B5.2030406@selasky.org>
Organization: Panasonic Corporation
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com,
 freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:53:15 -0000

> On 09/22/14 08:31, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> Hi HPS,
>>
>> Could you refer to the following document (4.6.6 Configure Endpoint:P.99)?
>> This document shows:
>>
>> If the Drop Context flag is `1' and the Add Context flag is `1', the xHC
>> shall:
>> o Release the current Resources and Bandwidth allocated to the
>>    endpoint and assign the new Resources and Bandwidth requested for
>>    the endpoint.
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I see.
> 
> Then what is missing to your patch is to mask away bits 0 and 1, because those
> are reserved for D0 and D1 and should be zero?

Hi, HPS,

You are correct, I think. We shold mask D0 and D1.
My host controller works both.

Thanks,
 Kohji Okuno.