From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 23 06:43:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3E116A4CE for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:43:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail2.cableone.net [24.116.0.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3124743D2F for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:43:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.25]) by smail2.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 23178090 for multiple; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:42:25 -0700 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:43:00 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Message-ID: <20041023014300.33f7e5af@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: FreeBSD questions list Subject: Re: "stress" testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:43:46 -0000 On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:14:06 -0600 "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" wrote: > Hi > > In reading one of the various performance threads recently in either > > -questions or -current, I seem to recall someone mentioning a > utility that can be used to do some sort of "stress" testing. The > reference was in a man page style [ command(n) ] type reference in > the thread. I though I saved it but cannot find it. Is there some > sort of port or utility or command that can do general > system/sub-system stress testing? > > I don't have any specific needs or requirements. The reference just > > looked interesting and I wanted to look into the facility mentioned > to see what it does and if it would be useful to me somehow to > stress new systems etc. You may find something of interest under the bench marking section of the ports tree