From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 02:55:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC69C1065688 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:55:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495598FC21 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:55:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia-2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E28340D3; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:55:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:55:52 +0200 From: cpghost To: "Kevin Oberman" Message-ID: <20080630045552.51d3531f@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20080630022655.D7B0945047@ptavv.es.net> References: <20080630012402.GA30723@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> <20080630022655.D7B0945047@ptavv.es.net> Organization: Cordula's Web X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.4.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sched_ule(1) and sched_4bsd(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:55:58 -0000 On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:26:55 -0700 "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:24:02 +0200 > > From: cpghost > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > > Hello, > > > > the man-pages sched_4bsd(1) and sched_ule(1) as of > > FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sat Jun 28 22:44:54 CEST 2008 > > both state that SCHED_4BSD is the default scheduler. > > Yet SCHED_ULE is now in GENERIC, and not SCHED_4BSD! > > > > Are the man-pages wrong, or is it better to change > > SCHED_ULE back to SCHED_4BSD in a custom kernel > > config file? I'm using SCHED_ULE on UP systems for > > quite some time now, and there don't seem to be any > > regressions so far... > > Looks like the man pages are a bit outdated. 4BSD was in GENERIC in > 7.0-RELEASE, but it was changed to ULE in stable shortly after the > release of 7.0. Ah, thank you. ;) Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/