From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 16 11:08:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA20299 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 11:08:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [129.72.251.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA20167 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 11:08:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA18181; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 12:07:53 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199803161907.MAA18181@lariat.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 12:07:50 -0700 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Merced Port of FreeBSD? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG According to the article at http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/news/0316/16merc.html only a few commercial vendors are likely to be able to survive the transition to 64-bit UNIX on Intel's Merced chip. Which begs the question: What about FreeBSD? Will it be ported in a timely manner? --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message