From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 8 13:30:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from goku.cl.msu.edu (goku.cl.msu.edu [35.8.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F76137BC07; Sat, 8 Apr 2000 13:30:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dervish@goku.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from dervish@localhost) by goku.cl.msu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA68350; Sat, 8 Apr 2000 16:30:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dervish) Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 16:30:22 -0400 From: Bush Doctor To: lioux@uol.com.br Cc: Kent Stewart , FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, "David J. Kanter" , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ports/devel/codecrusader Makefile Fixes Message-ID: <20000408163022.A68329@goku.cl.msu.edu> References: <200004041002.DAA09557@freefall.freebsd.org> <38EBBDE2.47FF5BF2@3-cities.com> <20000405223501.B86568@ikhala.tcimet.net> <38EBF298.1B051729@3-cities.com> <20000405235751.A86786@ikhala.tcimet.net> <38EC1472.28B209C7@3-cities.com> <20000406170029.B98981@goku.cl.msu.edu> <38EE5DB0.4C9F3668@3-cities.com> <20000408023230.A346@Fedaykin.here> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000408023230.A346@Fedaykin.here>; from lioux@uol.com.br on Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 02:32:30AM -0300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 WWW-Home-Page: http://bantu.cl.msu.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Out of da blue lioux@uol.com.br aka (lioux@uol.com.br) said: > > Here is what I have had to do to make Code Crusader 1.5.3 build as a > > port. > > Well, can I package your insights and send in a patch till sunday? Is > that okay with you? > > However, I am trying a different approach. I am building separate > ports for the latest ACE and JX. Besides, I am considering writing > additional ports for each lib written with the jx x11-toolkits, if > that can be acomplished. Having a separate port for ACE sounds good, but remmeber that codecrusader uses a small subset of ACE libraries and users may balk if codecrusader builds the full ACE package. It may be that we could have multiple ACE ports, one building the entire package, and then smaller ports that build a subset. > > This way I will be able to keep the latest libraries available without > touching codecrusader. Furthermore, this will enable other JX and ACE > dependent ports to be easily built. This might get done real soon if > everybody keeps working this fast. :) > > -- > regards, mferreira #;^) -- f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng. bush doctor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message