From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 12 01:27:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A720D106566C for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE448FC13 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7C0xwg5075519; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:59:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m7C0xvUH028011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:59:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200808120059.m7C0xvUH028011@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:00:05 -0400 To: Robert Watson , stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: Subject: Re: HEADS UP: inpcb/inpcbinfo rwlocking: coming to a 7-STABLE branch near you X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:27:12 -0000 At 05:21 PM 8/8/2008, Robert Watson wrote: > >http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20080808-7stable-rwlock-inpcb.diff > >These incude the inpcb/inpcbinfo read/write locking changes >(although not yet for raw/divert sockets). Any testing, especially >with heavy UDP loads, would be much appreciated -- this are fairly >complex changes, and also quite a complex MFC. Hi Robert, So far so good with the patches. I am running them on a busy sendmail server that also does a lot of DNS locally for itself and a number of other boxes. ---Mike