From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Jan 4 12:33:33 2001 From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 4 12:33:32 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EAA37B400; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 12:33:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f04KXVJ17907; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 12:33:31 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101042033.f04KXVJ17907@ptavv.es.net> To: Assar Westerlund Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Lucent Wavelan and 4.2 works like a charm. In-reply-to: Your message of "04 Jan 2001 17:23:17 +0100." <5ly9wrgubu.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 12:33:31 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Sender: oberman@ptavv.es.net Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Sender: assar@assaris.sics.se > From: Assar Westerlund > Date: 04 Jan 2001 17:23:17 +0100 > Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG > > > --=-=-= > > Stefan `Sec` Zehl writes: > > A quick 'wicontrol -p 1' later everything > > worked. > > I think the default should be changed to BSS. See > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2000/12/31/0007.html for some > arguments. Comments? > Another vote for this. Looks like ad-hoc is going away on the Windows side, as well, in favor of IBSS. Ad hoc mode was never a standard, just something that worked. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message