From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 11 18:29:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from newman2.bestweb.net (newman2.bestweb.net [209.94.102.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8472837B423 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:16:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from okeeffe.bestweb.net (okeefe.bestweb.net [209.94.100.110]) by newman2.bestweb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1174232D7; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:16:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by okeeffe.bestweb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 2E81D9EE40; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:11:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:08:07 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Cejka Rudolf Cc: Garance A Drosihn , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable Message-Id: <20020212021141.2E81D9EE40@okeeffe.bestweb.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > Garance A Drosihn wrote (2002/02/06): > > Anything else I should check? I realize there's about a million > > differences between the two branches, and there might also be > > something about my machine's setup which is a major culprit here. > > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > > seeing for performance when they run current. > > There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE > disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled > in -current. I don't think that is true anymore. -stable has WC enabled as well. -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message