From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 10:46:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AAA16A45F for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:46:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4EFC43D45 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A602B2087; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:46:33 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -3.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9381F2085; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:46:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 61CAF33C1D; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:46:33 +0100 (CET) To: Wesley Shields References: <79e2026f0601142345x1a9269bdl3153d1bb110be08d@mail.gmail.com> <86ek34d35f.fsf@xps.des.no> <17359.49899.183831.844670@bhuda.mired.org> <86k6cww445.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060119175224.GA71633@csh.rit.edu> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:46:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060119175224.GA71633@csh.rit.edu> (Wesley Shields's message of "Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:52:24 -0500") Message-ID: <863bjjw512.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Ashok Shrestha , Brandon Flowers , Mike Meyer , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speed up port compiling using RAM (tmpfs) ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:46:41 -0000 Wesley Shields writes: > I think he is trying to get at a scenario where WRKDIR is on a seperate > disk from the one /usr/ports is on. There is no performance advantage in doing that. I can only see two possible reasons for pointing WRKDIRPREFIX to another disk: - insufficient space on /usr (but then again, you could just move the ports tree to that other disk and mount it on /usr/ports) - /usr/ports on NFS (I do that myself to facilitate testing changes on different platforms) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no