From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 27 21:56:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rush.telenordia.se (mail.telenordia.se [194.213.64.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C4E337B479 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 21:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17622 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2000 06:56:12 +0200 Received: from bb-62-5-7-17.bb.tninet.se (HELO marbsd.tninet.se) (62.5.7.17) by mail.telenordia.se with SMTP; 28 Oct 2000 06:56:12 +0200 From: Mark Rowlands Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 06:51:39 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Nate Puri , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20001027213320.15022.qmail@web3304.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20001027213320.15022.qmail@web3304.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Satisfied w/ your desktop? MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00102806513900.03562@marbsd.tninet.se> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday 27 October 2000 23:33, Nate Puri wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question for ya. > > In light of using the highly integrated Windows > desktop or the Mac OS X desktop, what configurations > for FBSD do you use that are comparable? > > I'm trying a lot of different stuff now. XFce, KDE1, > KDE2, GNOME, Afterstep, WindowMaker, BlackBox and a > combination of apps that are better than 1.x. I've > tried them all. I'd just like to hear thoughts on what > people use who have used their configuration for a > long time now without switching. > Been using KDE for about a year ... tried a couple of others, Gnome for example,found KDE good in terms of stability / functionality....I hear from the gnomers that big strides have been made in stability so.......it maay also now be worth a crack. but if a windows person asks me about using FreeBSD for a personal computer KDE is the one I am going to show them To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message