From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 12:08:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E6D16A41F for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:08:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F303143D6D for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:08:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 24426 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2005 12:08:18 -0000 Received: from maxwell6.pacific.net.sg (203.120.90.212) by smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg with SMTP; 23 Aug 2005 12:08:18 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.246.165]) by maxwell6.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20050823120817.OJBI1233.maxwell6.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:08:17 +0800 Message-ID: <430B11B0.20702@pacific.net.sg> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:08:16 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Jennejohn References: <200508221720.j7MHKpNb022773@peedub.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <200508221720.j7MHKpNb022773@peedub.jennejohn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM Active Protection System Approach X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:08:25 -0000 Hi, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > Borja Marcos writes: > >>>Søren Schmidt writes: > It seems to me that the worst-case scenario, dropping the laptop, > would result in extremely high G-loading in microsecomds rather than > milliseconds. Not much can be done to save the disk in such a short > time. > The sensor will notice already the start of the move. The notebook will then normally be accalerated with 1G as it simply goes into a free fall. If the heads are then moved away from the disks and the notebook hits some ms later ground, it does not matter any more if this event takes micro- or milliseconds as the heads are already out of the danger zone. Erich