From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 03:43:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C4216A468 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 03:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46DE13C447 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 03:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8271A3C1A; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F867513FC; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:43:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2BE88C283; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:43:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:43:03 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Stephen Hurd Message-ID: <20070617034303.GA35282@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <4673B0DB.3040100@sasktel.net> <46742CF6.3050901@sasktel.net> <20070616202819.GA29331@rot13.obsecurity.org> <4674572D.9060707@sasktel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4674572D.9060707@sasktel.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Sam Lawrance , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Clarification on fetch/extract targets X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 03:43:06 -0000 On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 02:33:33PM -0700, Stephen Hurd wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>Actually, I found it quite easy to have the port pull the sources from > >>svn. Who are we concerned about making it easier for and why (and how > >>is it any easier?) > >> > > > >Everyone behind a firewall that only allows fetching via HTTP/FTP, for > >one. Also everyone without live network access, and those with > >pay-per-download who have a free local distfile mirror, etc. > > > >Tarballs are overwhelmingly preferred. > > > >Kris > > > Ok... I was looking at it from the standpoint of someone who wants the > newest version and doesn't care of the pkg-plist is stale. They could > just bump PORTREVISION and reinstall. > > So... how about this: > - A distfile target which generates a distfile. The idea being that > this would be the one on the local distfile mirror or what have you. > - A WITH_SVN option (defaults to off) which allows the end user to > specify he/she wants to use the subversion. > > In this case then, the end user would need to bump PORTREVISION and > enable the WITH_SVN option. That sounds fine. Kris