From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 24 14: 5:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp05.primenet.com (smtp05.primenet.com [206.165.6.135])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6E29637B424; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tlambert@usr06.primenet.com)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by smtp05.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA00494;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:05:07 -0700 (MST)
Received: from usr06.primenet.com(206.165.6.206)
 via SMTP by smtp05.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAYXaiTa; Tue Apr 24 14:04:49 2001
Received: (from tlambert@localhost)
	by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA25453;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:07:39 -0700 (MST)
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Message-Id: <200104242107.OAA25453@usr06.primenet.com>
Subject: RE: PATCH to make maxfiles, maxfiles per proc boot-time tunable
To: jhb@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 21:07:34 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: terry@lambert.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

] Why assign them the value of 0?  Why not just stick them in the BSS?
] The SI_SUB_TUNABLE checks will initialize them to a value anyways..

Mostly, to leave them where I found them, for paranoia reasons.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message