From owner-freebsd-ipfw Wed Feb 23 11:31:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from relay.ultimanet.com (relay.ultimanet.com [205.179.129.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93AF37B92B for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:31:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@Cloudfactory.ORG) Received: from Cloudfactory.ORG (cloudfactory.org [205.179.129.18]) by relay.ultimanet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24642 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:34:26 -0800 Message-Id: <200002231934.LAA24642@relay.ultimanet.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: two ethernet connections...tell a packet to go back the way it came.. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:39:19 PST." <200002231839.KAA01964@jetsam.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:33:48 -0800 From: Randy Primeaux Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Paul, What is your goal? That scenario sounds very static; routed(8) should do. You might consider gated with WAN protocols, such as BGP-4, for additional flexability. /usr/ports/net/gated How is ethernet connectivity delivered to the machine? Two routers? Paul Orr writes: > One machine. > Two ethernets. > An ISP on each ethernet connection. > A packet comes in through interface #1. > Need to tell the reply to go back through interface #1. > Same situation for interface #2. > Does anything exist for this kinda setup? -- Randy Primeaux randy@cloudfactory.org http://cloudfactory.org/~randy/ tranze@hyperreal.org http://hyperreal.org/~tranze/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message