From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 20 16:20:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E90116A402 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979B913C459 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0KGJjA9069730; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:19:45 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070120101909.024793e0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:19:36 -0600 To: VeeJay , m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <2cd0a0da0701200805j7b99e6e8s19a8d09b6040317a@mail.gmail.co m> References: <2cd0a0da0701192320l5b64fee3l50f88977306d3b57@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20070120082434.02453400@mail.computinginnovations.com> <2cd0a0da0701200805j7b99e6e8s19a8d09b6040317a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: SSH2 question? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:20:21 -0000 Yes I have used vsftpd from the ports to do just that. -Derek At 10:05 AM 1/20/2007, VeeJay wrote: >Hello friends... > >I really appreciate for your kind help.... > >having one more question... > >can I jail a user being login via SSH/SFTP to an other location/directory >than user's $HOME directory? > > >meaing if users $HOME directory is like this > >/home/alex > >and user is able to chdir to upward... > > >but I want to limit/chroot user to some other location like > >/home/temp > >and don't want to have user chdir upward... ..... > >Thanks... > >VJ > > >On 1/20/07, Derek Ragona ><derek@computinginnovations.com> wrote: >Yes different keys for different hosts, stored below their home directory. > > -Derek > > >At 01:20 AM 1/20/2007, VeeJay wrote: >>Hello >> >>I have two questions, please comment... >> >>1. Can one user have more than one public_keys i.e. multiple public_keys? >> >>If yes to above, would all be stored at users path like /home/username/.ssh >> >>If yes, to above, would all public keys be written at the same line >>for option in ssh_config file "AuthorizedKeysFile"? >> >>AuthorizedKeysFile .ssh/user_authorized_keys >> >>2. What about other users who also have SSH account, How to indentify in >>ssh_config file that which public_key belongs to which user? >> >>-- >>Thanks! >> >>BR / vj >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org >>" >> >>-- >>This message has been scanned for viruses and >>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>believed to be clean. >>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for >their support. > > > > >-- >Thanks! > >BR / vj >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for >their support. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.