From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 24 6:39:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.orakel.ntnu.no (apollo.orakel.ntnu.no [129.241.56.245]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 988C237BAFE for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 06:39:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oyvindmo@pvv.ntnu.no) Received: (qmail 10182 invoked by uid 28778); 24 Apr 2000 13:39:38 -0000 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk suggestion: INSTALL_BEFORE_ARGS References: <20000423134810.R6549@argon.blackdawn.com> <20000424134438.B74806@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20000424075531.A604@argon.blackdawn.com> From: Oyvind Moll Date: 24 Apr 2000 15:39:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20000424075531.A604@argon.blackdawn.com> Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Will Andrews | | [...] Having INSTALL_BEFORE_ARGS helps debug things (i.e. | when ports do things they're not supposed to do during the build). You have my vote -- it would indeed be quite helpful. | To -ports: Hello, anyone here!? Do you want me to write code for this | before a discussion ensues??? After some hours contemplation, I have arrived at the conclusion that some ports-people have possibly taken some time off from ports-work in the Easter holidays, I guess. :-) Yeah, weird behaviour, I agree. (Hmm, do you call it "Easter holidays" or "spring break"?) --=20 =D8yvind M=F8ll oyvindmo@initio.no http://www.initio.no/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message