From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 21 02:31:04 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA11921 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 21 May 1996 02:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA11914 for ; Tue, 21 May 1996 02:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id CAA09292; Tue, 21 May 1996 02:30:25 -0700 (PDT) To: "David S. Miller" cc: terry@lambert.org, jehamby@lightside.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Congrats on CURRENT 5/1 SNAP... In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 May 1996 04:23:57 EDT." <199605210823.EAA07997@huahaga.rutgers.edu> Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 02:30:25 -0700 Message-ID: <9290.832671025@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [-current dropped; things are either -current or -hackers material but not both since too many folks span both lists] > Clustering is the answer and can scale to more CPU's than you can > count in an unsigned char. ;-) I'd be quite interested in hearing more about how you might see building workable clusters for WWW and FTP service provision, as would I daresay every ISP who's ever started with 1 FreeBSD system and wound up with 20 of them (the administration for which starts to resemble the juggling of hand grenades). :-) Jordan