From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 12:37:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F8016A41F; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:37:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-er5.mbrd.ru [194.117.71.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C56D43D46; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:37:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.4.9]) by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.x) id 1EFA2e-0003Gz-KS; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:37:40 +0400 Message-ID: <4326C813.9040202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:37:39 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <200509102222.j8AMMubj032724@bright.research.att.com> <4326A53C.5020808@FreeBSD.org> <1126609121.54365.17.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4326B439.4090308@FreeBSD.org> <1126610216.54365.20.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4326B5CF.1070606@FreeBSD.org> <1126610573.54365.23.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20050913122601.GG563@isis.sigpipe.cz> <1126614807.54365.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <1126614807.54365.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Roman Neuhauser Subject: Re: Unifying WWW: pkg-descr lines for cpan ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:37:55 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> I beg to disagree. I wouldn't be looking for it there. A 3.2.1.1 >> would be better. > > > I don't want to clutter Quick Porting section with such specialized > info. It's supposed to give you a really quick start to your first port. You right. 6.4 section is 'Using perl' and question we discuss is for it. > > We can debate if the structuring of PH into Quick Porting and Slow > Porting, duplicating much of the data of first in the second, is a good > design. It's a great design. I still remember I read it for a first time. > > It could be a "Note:". > Agree. -- Sem.