From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Nov 13 6:46:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bumper.jellybaby.net (bumper.jellybaby.net [194.159.247.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F1737B4C5 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 06:46:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (from simond@localhost) by bumper.jellybaby.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) id OAA44439; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:46:37 GMT (envelope-from simond) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:46:37 +0000 From: simond@irrelevant.org To: Shawn Barnhart Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BIND and Win2k interaction Message-ID: <20001113144637.B37903@irrelevant.org> References: <009301c04d7f$1c17c8c0$b8209fc0@marlowe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <009301c04d7f$1c17c8c0$b8209fc0@marlowe>; from swb@grasslake.net on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 08:36:29AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 08:36:29AM -0600, Shawn Barnhart wrote: > Is anyone running a STABLE with one of the 8.2.3-T5B or greater BINDs and > any DNS interaction with Win2kSP1? > > I've been trying to debug some interoperability problems with Win2k DNS > (zone transfers not working, notifies ignored, etc). I'm running a couple > of different STABLEs (4.1 and 4.1.1), all of which have BIND 8.2.3-T5B and > have been working happily with each other, but they won't play nice with > Win2k. The Win2K machines I have been using are not running ADS. > > I asked over on the bind-users mailing list. I got an answer initially of > "this should work". After further debugging on my end and discovering > stranger interoperability problems I got another answer from the same person > of "As you know, 8.2.3 is BETA software.." and the usual litany of > not-running-BETA software. It's not clear if it's known to be broken or > what. > > Since I don't exactly consider STABLE to be beta and it doesn't look > particularly easy to override the included BIND, I'm wondering if someone > else here has seen interaction problems with it. > > I'm interested in general BIND/Win2k interaction tips, horror stories, etc, > but I wouldn't be trying to integrate these two if I didn't have to, so > "dump Win2k" comments should be sent to /dev/null. I don't know about the rest, but if you don't want BIND to be built and override any other version you're using, just set NO_BIND= true in your /etc/make.conf -- Simon Dick simond@irrelevant.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message