From owner-freebsd-security Sun Feb 25 20:13:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lark.capnet.state.tx.us (lark.capnet.state.tx.us [204.65.39.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BD737B503 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:13:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Bryan.Bradsby@capnet.state.tx.us) Received: from localhost (bbradsby@localhost) by lark.capnet.state.tx.us (8.11.2/8.10.0-NO UCE) with ESMTP id f1Q4D5v18421; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 22:13:05 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 22:13:05 -0600 (CST) From: Bryan Bradsby To: Subject: Re: /etc/rc.firewall fixes In-Reply-To: <200102202005.f1KK5kv83619@medusa.kfu.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This thread veered off from the topic that interests me. I would also like to see comments on possible changes to the rc.firewall rules. Perhaps adding a category for a server (no nat or gateway) i.e. for a DNS, e-mail, pop3, or web server exposed to the big bad internet. Thank you, -bryan bradsby ================================ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message