From owner-freebsd-security Fri Sep 22 16:49:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A695A37B423 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA12267; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:49:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA72314; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:49:42 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200009222349.RAA72314@harmony.village.org> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Subject: Re: sysinstall DOESN'T ASK, dangerous defaults! Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:28:27 PDT." <200009222328.e8MNSTF13435@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: <200009222328.e8MNSTF13435@cwsys.cwsent.com> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:49:42 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <200009222328.e8MNSTF13435@cwsys.cwsent.com> Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group writes: : So my question is why the second TCP session between rshd/kshd and : rsh/krsh? Is it for a full-duplex session? So that stderr can be connected back to the original person w/o having to have the two fd's multiplexed. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message