From owner-freebsd-questions Sun May 9 15:45:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from iguana.internexo.co.cr (iguana.internexo.co.cr [196.40.17.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D4D14C8E for ; Sun, 9 May 1999 15:45:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@iguana.internexo.co.cr) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by iguana.internexo.co.cr (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA02819; Sun, 9 May 1999 16:44:10 -0600 (CST) From: Theodore Hope Message-Id: <199905092244.QAA02819@iguana.internexo.co.cr> Subject: Re: ICQ Behind NAT (Was: question about 2 subnets on the same switch. To: ChrisMic@clientlogic.com (Christopher Michaels) Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 16:44:10 -0600 (CST) Cc: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu, questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB440110586C@site2s1> from "Christopher Michaels" at May 8, 99 04:06:18 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Pardon my intrusion, but why is this so problematic? I've been running ICQ > behind my firewall w/o any apparent problems. Maybe I just haven't noticed > them. > > Also, on that note, what SOCKS proxy would you recommend? The real thing is at http://www.socks.nec.com -T To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message