From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 00:21:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D14916A4CE; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:21:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7466A43D46; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:21:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j220LPvG060638; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 01:21:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j220LOlO060637; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 01:21:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 01:21:24 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Tom Rhodes Message-ID: <20050302002124.GD50779@abigail.blackend.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Rhodes , Marc Fonvieille , freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org References: <200503011340.j21DeKHe048812@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050301182651.2b8ce710@mobile.pittgoth.com> <20050301234702.GC50779@abigail.blackend.org> <20050301185553.36c14c16@mobile.pittgoth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050301185553.36c14c16@mobile.pittgoth.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-PRERELEASE cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: Marc Fonvieille Subject: Re: docs/78240: Replace with around a # X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:21:27 -0000 On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 06:55:53PM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > > I'm not sure there is a rule for a single character. > > > > > > If you want to stress the importance or abnormal appearance of > > > a character, then quote is good. > > > > > > I'm also debating the usefulness of this patch. > > > > > > > Really? > [I was joking with the "really" :) anyway, my jokes are weird at 1am :) ] > Yep. I mean, we use literal everywhere else. There shouldn't > really be a reason to quote the specific character. > > In all honesty, I guess it depends on how you look at it. > In fact I was wondering about a typographic rule, I was wondering if people used to put quotes cause they could not "emphasize" the character via any rendering. I just looked at a (french) typographic book, it seems (nothing is stated) they use quotes for a single character, on another typographic book no quotes... I will reread them on tomorrow morning. Marc