From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 30 20:53:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9726316A421; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:53:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E3643D48; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:53:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9UKrfUl093025; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:53:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <436532D5.8000906@samsco.org> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:53:41 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John-Mark Gurney References: <200510271734.j9RHYZAk015054@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051030062148.GA76667@dragon.NUXI.org> <4364D017.1050605@samsco.org> <20051030171611.GW4115@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20051030171611.GW4115@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin , obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf DEFAULTS GENERIC X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:53:48 -0000 John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Scott Long wrote this message on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 06:52 -0700: > >>>I'm also curious why we don't explicitly 'include' >>>DEFAULTS in GENERIC vs. the new automagic include feature. >> >>Because if it was specifically mentioned in the GENERIC config file then >>it would be deleted by people who don't understand what it does or why >>it's important, and it would be missed by people writing config files >>from scratch or migrating from previous versions of FreeBSD. > > > I'm sorry, I don't buy this... The reason: > device npx > > If you don't get it, think about it. > Guess I'm too dumb to get it. Scott