From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 16:00:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB13916A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:00:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D0443D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:00:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CG0Klq009001 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:00:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0CG0KRv009000; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:00:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:00:20 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200601121600.k0CG0KRv009000@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Sangwoo Shim Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC5E16A422 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:56:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [216.136.204.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B121143D77 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:55:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0CFtff1057090 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:55:41 GMT (envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k0CFtf3h057089; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:55:41 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <200601121555.k0CFtf3h057089@www.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:55:41 GMT From: Sangwoo Shim To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-2.3 Cc: Subject: ports/91711: Shouldn't ports/x11-toolkit/freeglut get moved to ports/graphics? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:00:21 -0000 >Number: 91711 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Shouldn't ports/x11-toolkit/freeglut get moved to ports/graphics? >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Jan 12 16:00:19 GMT 2006 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Sangwoo Shim >Release: FreeBSD 7-CURRENT >Organization: Seoul Natl' Univ. >Environment: FreeBSD ssw.dyndns.org 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Dec 22 04:15:40 KST 2005 root@ssw.dyndns.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SSW amd64 >Description: As far as I know, both graphics/libglut and x11-toolkit/freeglut give same API (library). Then why should they lie in the different categories? I think freeglut should be moved to ports/graphics also, and marked as conflict against graphics/libglut to avoid confusions. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: