From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 13:35:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B92216A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:35:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marks@ripe.net) Received: from postman.ripe.net (postman.ripe.net [193.0.0.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0232A43D48 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:35:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marks@ripe.net) Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 4008) id 358092481A; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:35:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from birch.ripe.net (birch.ripe.net [193.0.1.96]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BD12404B; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:35:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from laptop.santcroos.net (cow.ripe.net [193.0.1.239]) by birch.ripe.net (8.12.10/8.11.6) with SMTP id j7BDZbmq005240; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:35:37 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 23018 invoked by uid 1001); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:35:37 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:35:37 +0200 From: Mark Santcroos To: Craig Rodrigues Message-ID: <20050811133537.GA96558@laptop.santcroos.net> References: <20050803200143.GA70735@crodrigues.org> <200508051049.26158.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20050805162234.GA96585@crodrigues.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050805162234.GA96585@crodrigues.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-RIPE-Spam-Level: X-RIPE-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-RIPE-Spam-Status: N 0.052775 / -5.9 X-RIPE-Signature: 5efe9109fe21c88ea3655c672f8695fb Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel patches for compilation with gcc 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:35:39 -0000 On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 12:22:34PM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 10:49:25AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > You need to get the acpi_wakeup changes reviewed. Not saving the gdt and idt > > descriptors across suspend/resume would be very disastrous. > > I sent a separate e-mail to njl@ and marks@ about the acpi_wakeup patch. > The patch was suggested to me by kan@. He suggested that > I remove the static variables which clashed with the global variables > of the same name, and to remove asm calls which saved them in acpi_wakeup.c This is an heads-up that I didn't forget you but didn't have time yet to review it. Mark -- RIPE NCC - Delft University of Technology - The FreeBSD Project marks@ripe.net - m.a.santcroos@ewi.tudelft.nl - marks@freebsd.org