From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 21 15:10:42 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C6C1065672
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:10:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C57A8FC16
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:10:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id B1C9F8C07D; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:10:41 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:10:41 -0500
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
Message-ID: <20100621151041.GA31392@lonesome.com>
References: <20100613092418.GH13886@home.opsec.eu>
	<20100613160813.GB11744@magic.hamla.org>
	<20100621140735.GK13886@home.opsec.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100621140735.GK13886@home.opsec.eu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Who to bug to commit some ports ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:10:42 -0000

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:07:35PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> There is a newer of dbvis version available (7.1).
> 
> Should I update my patch or how is this supposed to be handled ?

That's the preferred way, yes.

And for your other question, there are currently 1211 PRs in the queue,
of which 98 are for new ports, so you'll simply need to be patient.

mcl