From owner-freebsd-chat  Fri Sep 29  6:23: 5 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from relay2.inwind.it (relay2.inwind.it [212.141.53.73])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9406137B422
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 06:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bartequi.ottodomain.org (62.98.153.26) by relay2.inwind.it (5.1.046)
        id 39CB09790010A8F2; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 15:21:55 +0200
From: Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:22:38 GMT
Message-ID: <20000929.14223800@bartequi.ottodomain.org>
Subject: Re: Unix 2000...
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: stork@QNET.COM, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <xzp7l7v9wvi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10009290255390.28516-100000@cello.qnet.com> <20000929.13432900@bartequi.ottodomain.org> <xzp7l7v9wvi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
X-Mailer: SuperCalifragilis
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 9/29/00, 2:00:01 PM, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> wrote=20
regarding Re: Unix 2000...:


> Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it> writes:
> > I seem to understand that the process is far from completion. The
> > difficulties on the part of M$ clearly show that NT is decidedly not=

> > the right tool for the job. If they are bent on wasting time (and
> > money) on this project, then so be it.

> AFAIK, they're transitioning to Windows 2000, not NT.


NT5 or Windows 2000 does not make much difference as to the final=20
result, does it ?





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message