From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 22:47:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06522FA7 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vfemail.net (nine.vfemail.net [108.76.175.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F1F32075 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18797 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2014 22:40:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO freequeue.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 30 Jul 2014 22:40:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 17917 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2014 22:40:12 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 17908, pid: 17911, t: 0.1044s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO smtp102-2.vfemail.net) (172.16.100.62) by FreeQueue with SMTP; 30 Jul 2014 22:40:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 29296 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2014 22:40:12 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 29254, pid: 29287, t: 1.1949s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO nil) (amJlaWNoQHZmZW1haWwubmV0@172.16.100.27) by 172.16.100.62 with ESMTPA; 30 Jul 2014 22:40:11 -0000 From: Jan Beich To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Status of the gecko team References: <20140730065341.GE37672@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:47:15 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin writes: > I would like to know what is the status of the gecko team, seems like it is not > pretty active anymore, what is your opinion? > > from my point of view firefox in ports is vulnerable for a while and noone > patches are getting into the tree about it. The update was incomplete as SeaMonkey 2.28 still lacks any distfile. So, I've created a branch with vulnerable 2.26.1 in anticipation of 2.26.2. To merge it do something like the following. $ svn co https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/firefox31 $ (cd firefox31; for d in */*/files; do rm -rf /usr/ports/$d; done) $ rsync -aC firefox31/ /usr/ports/ There's also Gecko_ChangeLog to use as a template for commit message. It lists important changes apart from port updates. ------------------------------------------------- VFEmail.net - http://www.vfemail.net ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the NSA's hands! $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! 15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas! Commercial and Bulk Mail Options!