From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 29 07:49:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43622106566C for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9F08FC13 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4T7nN7P005449; Fri, 29 May 2009 09:49:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n4T7nNXv005446; Fri, 29 May 2009 09:49:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:49:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: utisoft@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1F9F36FCD9644D4683DADAF7DD62B412@john> <200905272209.28550.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DE8DE@w2003s01.double-l.local> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Johan Hendriks , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stable Mail Server And Web Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:49:30 -0000 >> >> What i use is: >> >> sendmail - in base system+procmail from ports. procmail is mainly used to >> store messages in maildir format. >> spamassassin as antispam, someone already pointed that dspam is faster i >> must check it. Anyway properly configured spamassassin isn't that bad. >> >> sqwebmail for webmail. it's highest performance and easiest to configure >> webmail i've tested. It's fortunately not PHP based, it's written in C. >> > > What's wrong with PHP? > 1) resource hungry 2) quite buggy. While here can be discussed how much is because of PHP itself, and how much of stupid-written PHP programs