From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Tue Apr 21 01:18:53 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39942B55AD
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 21 Apr 2020 01:18:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com)
Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495m185qsFz4SgM
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 01:18:52 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com)
From: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Wayland on FreeBSD
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:18:51 -0600
References: <CAFYkXjmfyLZAi1HZe-RE3wLxa6GRNP6GkmtZG-4T2puRDOz0JA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGLDxTX5EeL3YDUJocdOM03sRzUDi3ed9cKuNH99DieZbrhGHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5058973.kMyvyFPq5o@amos>
To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <5058973.kMyvyFPq5o@amos>
Message-Id: <CAB4989B-95E7-43B6-B338-B9524B9D9FDA@kreme.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 495m185qsFz4SgM
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42
 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.986,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0];
 IP_SCORE(-0.12)[ip: (-0.34), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.06), asn: 209(-0.13),
 country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 01:18:53 -0000

On 20 Apr 2020, at 02:24, Ihor Antonov <ngor@antonovs.family> wrote:
> But even in 10 years FreeBSD hackers will keep using rotting X11

Perhaps. A tiny percentage. The rest will continue as they are now, =
avoiding X11 at all costs because it is insecure bloat that interferes =
with the desired operation of the machine.

FreeBSD doesn=E2=80=99t delude its users into thinking it is a =
reasoanable desktop; linux does but it is a delusion.


--=20
I WILL NOT SCREAM FOR ICE CREAM Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF03