From owner-cvs-all Sun Dec 27 23:00:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA00604 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 23:00:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (sj-dsl-9-129-138.dspeed.net [209.249.129.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA00599 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 23:00:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA52236; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 23:00:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199812280700.XAA52236@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Mike Smith , committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The recent fracas involving danes, war axes and wounded developers In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:38:46 PST." <199812280538.VAA07862@dingo.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 23:00:34 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > What would be the reaction to the suggestion that failing to vote is > grounds for removal from core? > > Obviously there is room here for formal abstinence, justifiable failure, > etc., but the principle being that if core is expected to be a working > group participating in the development process, then it needs to act as > such. Thats sounds great specially if the -core member's vote is recorded. Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message